Overview

The full picture at a glance.

Decoding how modern parents evaluate and select schools in a competitive education landscape

Client

A category-leading edtech platform providing data-driven guidance to parents, serving a large base of digitally engaged families.

Industry

Education

Geography

United Kingdom (England, Scotland, Wales)

Audience

Parents aged 28 - 50 with children aged 3–16

Responses

3,000 responses

Timeline

2 weeks

Problem

The business issue that triggered the study.

School groups and education providers were witnessing inconsistent enrolment rates despite strong academic performance. While traditional metrics like rankings and results were prioritized internally, there was limited visibility into how parents actually evaluated and shortlisted schools in a real-world decision making context.

Challenge

The constraints and decision complexity behind the brief.

  • School selection is a multi-layered emotional and rational decision
  • Parents evaluate multiple options simultaneously across public and private institutions
  • Lack of large-scale, structured data capturing decision hierarchy rather than isolated preferences
  • Regional and income-based differences influencing priorities
Solution

How the research program was designed and executed.

  • A comprehensive 2-week quantitative research program was designed to capture decision making at scale
  • Collected 3000 responses through structured surveys across the UK
  • Programmed questionnaire to capture both stated preferences and forced trade offs
  • Evaluated over 20 decision attributes, including academic outcomes, safety, extracurriculars, infrastructure, fees, and proximity
  • Segmented parents by income, geography, and child age group
Impact

What changed once the findings were made actionable.

  • Established a clear decision hierarchy model for school selection
  • Revealed hidden gaps between what schools communicate vs what parents value
  • Enabled institutions to redesign their outreach strategies and messaging frameworks
  • Provided a scalable benchmark for future enrolment cycles
Results

The outcome signals that mattered most.

150%

Academic performance and safety together accounted

52%

Extracurricular offerings influenced decisions of urban parents

31%

Enrolment inquiries increased within one admission cycle

26%

Marketing efficiency improved through targeted communication

Takeaway

The clearest strategic lesson from the study.

In high-consideration sectors like education, decision hierarchy—not just preference data—drives conversion outcomes.

AIM Research
AIM Research

Ready to launch your own research?

Tell us about your research goals. We'll help you design the survey, reach the right audience, and turn raw data into insights.